化学发光免疫分析试剂批间差补偿模型的建立及不确定度评定
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

许昌医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Establishment and evaluation of uncertainty of batch-to-batch difference compensation model for chemiluminescence immunoassay reagents
Author:
Affiliation:

Xuchang Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 化学发光免疫分析(chemiluminescence immunoassay,CLIA)试剂在更换批号时易出现检测结果的系统性偏移,影响生化检验项目的连续性与可比性。本研究旨在建立一种适用于临床实验室的试剂批间差补偿模型,并对补偿后结果进行测量不确定度评定,为基层医院检验科试剂批间切换提供可操作的质控方案。方法 选取许昌医院检验科在用CLIA平台开展研究,以肌酸激酶同工酶(creatine kinase-MB,CK-MB)、胱抑素C(cystatin C,Cys-C)及降钙素原(procalcitonin,PCT)3个生化相关免疫项目为研究对象,收集3个连续试剂批号(Lot A、Lot B、Lot C)的检测数据,每批号同步测定31例临床剩余血清样本及2个水平室内质控品。以Lot A为参比批号,采用Deming回归建立Lot B、Lot C对Lot A的补偿转移方程;从重复性、批内差、批间差、校准品赋值等分量合成测量不确定度,给出扩展不确定度U(k=2)。结果 3个项目中,未补偿前Lot B、Lot C相对Lot A的偏倚范围为-4.8%~+8.2%,超出美国1988 年临床实验室改进法案修正案(Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment ""88,CLIA""88)允许总误差(total error allowable,TEa)的1/3;经Deming回归补偿后,偏倚降至-1.3%~+1.5%,均落入可接受区间。不确定度评定显示,补偿后CK-MB(Lot B)、Cys-C(Lot B)、Cys-C(Lot C)、PCT(Lot C)的扩展不确定度分别为4.3%、4.1%、5.2%、6.2%(k=2),主要贡献分量为校准品赋值不确定度与回归残差。所建补偿模型在后续6 个月实际应用中,室间质量评价(external quality assessment,EQA)回报合格率由补偿前的92.3%提升至100%。结论 基于Deming回归的试剂批间差补偿模型可有效校正CLIA试剂批号更换带来的系统偏移,结合ISO/TS 20914框架的不确定度评定可量化补偿后结果的可靠性,适合在基层医院检验科推广。

    Abstract:

    Objective The chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) reagents are prone to systematic deviation of test results when changing batch numbers, which affects the continuity and comparability of biochemical test items. This study aimed to establish a reagent batch-to-batch difference compensation model suitable for clinical laboratories, and to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the compensated results, so as to provide an operational quality control scheme for reagent batch-to-batch switching in laboratory departments of primary hospitals. Methods This study was conducted on the currently used CLIA platform in the Department of Clinical Laboratory of Xuchang Hospital. Three biochemical-related immune projects, namely creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), cystatin C (Cys-C) and procalcitonin (PCT), were selected as the research objects, and the detection data of three consecutive reagent batches (Lot A, Lot B and Lot C) were collected. Each batch was simultaneously measured for 31 clinical remaining serum samples and 2 horizontal laboratory quality controls. Taking Lot A as the reference batch number, the compensation transfer equation of Lot B and Lot C to Lot A was established by Deming regression. In addition, the measurement uncertainty was synthesized from components such as repeatability, intrabatch difference, inter-batch difference, and calibrator assignment, and the extended uncertainty U (k=2) was given. Results The bias ranged from ?4.8%?+8.2% for Lot B and Lot C compared to Lot A before compensation, which exceeded 1/3 of the total error allowable (TEa) of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment ""88 (CLIA"" 88). After Deming regression compensation, the bias decreased to ?1.3%? +1.5%, all of which fell within the acceptable interval. The uncertainty assessment showed that the extended uncertainty of CKMB (Lot B), Cys-C (Lot B), Cys-C (Lot C) and PCT (Lot C) after compensation was 4.3%, 4.1%, 5.2% and 6.2%, respectively (k=2). The main contribution components were the uncertainty of calibrator assignment and the regression residual. In the practical application of the established compensation model in the following 6 months, the qualified rate of return of external quality assessment (EQA) increased from 92.3% before compensation to 100%. Conclusion The Deming regression-based compensation model can effectively correct the system shift caused by the change of batch number of CLIA reagents. Combined with the uncertainty evaluation of ISO/TS 20914 framework, the reliability of the compensated results can be quantified, and it is suitable for popularization in laboratory departments of primary hospitals.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

柏金.化学发光免疫分析试剂批间差补偿模型的建立及不确定度评定[J].生物医学工程学进展,2026,(4):107-111

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-08-20
  • 最后修改日期:2026-08-27
  • 录用日期:2026-08-29
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-10-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码