急诊经导管动脉栓塞术治疗急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血的疗效及出血征象的DSA分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

兰考第一医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Efficacy of emergency transcatheter arterial embolization for acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and analysis of bleeding signs on digital subtraction angiography
Author:
Affiliation:

Lankao First Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨急诊经导管动脉栓塞术(transcatheter arterial embolization,TAE)治疗急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血(acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding,ANVUGIB)的临床疗效,并分析其数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)出血征象与疗效的对应关系。方法 回顾性分析兰考第一医院2021年1月至2025年12月收治的行急诊TAE治疗的80例ANVUGIB患者的临床资料,均经DSA检查明确出血动脉及出血征象,按征象分型采用明胶海绵、微弹簧圈或二者联合栓塞。记录技术成功率、临床成功率、30 d 再出血率、并发症发生率,并比较不同DSA 征象分型的疗效差异。结果 80例患者技术成功率为96.25%(77/80),临床成功率为90.00%(72/80),30 d内再出血率为8.75%(7/80),主要并发症发生率为6.25%(5/80),无栓塞相关肠缺血、死亡病例。DSA征象分为对比剂外溢型(38例)、假性动脉瘤型(22例)、血管壁缺损/渗血型(12例)、造影阴性型(8例)四类,其中对比剂外溢型与假性动脉瘤型技术成功率均达100%,而造影阴性型技术成功率仅为62.50%(5/8),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 急诊TAE治疗ANVUGIB安全有效,尤其适用于内镜治疗失败或不耐受内镜者;DSA出血征象分型对栓塞策略选择与疗效预判具有重要指导价值,造影阴性者需结合超选择性插管与经验性栓塞综合判断。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of emergency transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in the treatment of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB), and to analyze the corresponding relationship between the bleeding signs and the efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 80 patients with ANVUGIB who underwent emergency TAE treatment at Lankao First Hospital from January 2021 to December 2025. All patients were treated with DSA angiography to confirm the bleeding arteries and bleeding signs, and were embolized with gelatin sponge, microcoil or a combination of both according to the signs. Moreover, the technical success rate, clinical success rate, 30-day rebleeding rate and complication rate were recorded, and the differences in efficacy of different DSA sign classifications were compared. Results The technical success rate was 96.25% (77/80), the clinical success rate was 90.00% (72/80), the rebleeding rate within 30 days was 8.75% (7/80), the incidence of major complications was 6.25% (5/80), and there were no cases of embolism-related intestinal ischemia and death. DSA signs were divided into four types: contrast agent spillover type (38 cases), pseudoaneurysm type (22 cases), vascular wall defect/osmotic type (12 cases) and contrast negative type (8 cases). The success rate of contrast agent spillover type and pseudoaneurysm type was 100%, while the success rate of contrast negative type was only 62.50% (5/8), and all differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusion Emergency TAE treatment of ANVUGIB is safe and effective, especially for patients who have failed endoscopic treatment or are intolerant to endoscopy. At the same time, the classification of DSA bleeding signs has important guiding value in the selection of embolization strategy and prediction of curative effect, and patients with negative angiography need to combine superselective intubation and empirical embolization for comprehensive judgment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙德勇.急诊经导管动脉栓塞术治疗急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血的疗效及出血征象的DSA分析[J].生物医学工程学进展,2026,(4):168-171

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-20
  • 最后修改日期:2026-08-14
  • 录用日期:2026-08-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-10-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码