风险评估策略下护理干预对经腹全子宫切除术后感染的预防价值
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

安阳市妇幼保健院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Preventive Value of Nursing Interventions Under the Risk Assessment Strategy for Infection Prevention after Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
Author:
Affiliation:

Anyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评估经腹全子宫切除术患者行风险评估策略下护理干预对预防术后感染的临床价值。 方法 回顾性收集2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月安阳市妇幼保健院收治的行经腹全子宫切除术患者的临床资料,按护理方法的不同分为研究组( n=39)和 对照组( n=39)。对照组采用常规护理干预,研究组采用风险评估策略下护理干预,比较两组术后感染及其他并发症发生率、围手术期指标、出院准备度及生活质量各维度评分。 结果 研究组术后感染发生率( 5.13%)低于对照组 ( 20.51%),差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。两组腹部胀气、切口愈合不良、下肢深静脉血栓发生率经比较,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。研究组首次排气时间、下床活动时间、进食流质时间、排便时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。研究组出院准备度量表( RHDS)评分[( 165.54 ±10.65)分]显著高于对照组[( 156.78±12.14)分],差异有统计学意义( t=3.388,P=0.001)。两组生活质量各维度评分的时间、组间、交互比较差异有统计学意义( P<0.05),且研究组生活质量各维度评分高于对照组( P<0.05)。 结论 经腹全子宫切除术患者行风险评估策略下护理干预,在控制术后感染方面优势显著,且可促进患者术后恢复,提高出院准备度,对提升术后生活质量具有促进作用。该研究为设计经腹全子宫切除术后感染风险智能管理系统提供了理论基础和数据支持。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the clinical value of nursing interventions based on risk assessment strategies for the prevention of postoperative infections in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy in Anyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2022 to May 2023 were retrospectively collected. According to different nursing methods, they were divided into study group (n=39) and control group (n=39). The control group received routine nursing interventions, while the study group received nursing interventions based on a risk assessment strategy. The incidence of postoperative infection and other complications, perioperative indexes, discharge readiness and quality of life scores were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of postoperative infection in the study group (5.13%) was lower than that in the control group (20.51%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no statistical significant difference in the incidence of abdominal bloating, poor wound healing, and deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs between the two groups (P>0.05). The time to first flatus, time to ambulation, time to start consuming liquids, and time to bowel movement were all shorter in the study group compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The RHDS score of the research group (165.54±10.65) was significantly higher than that of the control group (156.78 ±12.14), with statistically significant differences (t=3.388, P=0.001). There were statistically significant differences in quality of life scores across various dimensions between the two groups, as well as in time, inter-group, and interaction comparisons (P<0.05), with the study group scoring higher in all dimensions than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Nursing interventions under the risk assessment strategy for patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy have significant advantages in controlling postoperative infections, promoting postoperative recovery, improving discharge readiness, and enhancing postoperative quality of life. It can provide important theoretical basis and practical data support for designing an intelligent management system for postoperative infection risk after total abdominal hysterectomy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李莹.风险评估策略下护理干预对经腹全子宫切除术后感染的预防价值[J].生物医学工程学进展,2025,46(4):549-556

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-06
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-11
  • 录用日期:2025-06-14
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码