直线加速器放射治疗老年 NSCLC 患者的临床疗效与安全性评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

浙江大学医学院附属第二医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Linear Accelerator Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Author:
Affiliation:

the second affiliated hospital zhejiang university school of medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨直线加速器放射治疗对老年非小细胞肺癌( NSCLC)患者的临床疗效与安全性,为临床治疗提供依据。 方法 选取 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月浙江大学医学院附属第二医院收治的老年 NSCLC 患者 60 例,随机分为干预组(直线加速器放射治疗)和对照组(常规放射治疗)各 30 例。评估两组患者近期疗效(客观疗效、客观缓解率、疾病控制率)、远期疗效(无进展生存期、总生存期)及放射治疗相关不良反应发生率。 结果 干预组客观疗效评价优于对照组( Z=2.163,P=0.031),客观缓解率显著高于对照组( 63.3% vs 36.7%, χ2=4.267, P=0.039)。干预组的中位无进展生存期( 9.8 个月 vs 6.5 个月, χ2=6.481, P=0.011)和中位总生存期( 21.4 个月 vs 16.8 个月, χ2=4.920, P=0.027)均显著长于对照组。两组在放射治疗相关不良反应发生率方面差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。 结论 直线加速器放射治疗能显著提高老年 NSCLC 患者的近期缓解率和长期生存率,且不会增加治疗相关不良反应,安全性良好。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of linear accelerator radiotherapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to provide a reference for clinical treatment. Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with NSCLC admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2020 to October 2022 were selected and randomly divided into an intervention group (linear accelerator radiotherapy) and a control group (conventional radiotherapy), with 30 patients in each group. The short-term efficacy (objective efficacy, objective response rate, disease control rate), long-term efficacy (progression-free survival, overall survival), and incidence of radiotherapy-related adverse events were assessed between the two groups. Results The objective efficacy in the intervention group was significantly better than that in the control group (Z=2.163, P=0.031), and the objective response rate was significantly higher than that of the control group (63.3% vs 36.7%, χ2=4.267, P=0.039). The median progression-free survival (9.8 months vs 6.5 months, χ2=6.481, P=0.011) and median overall survival (21.4 months vs 16.8 months, χ2=4.920, P=0.027) were both significantly longer in the intervention group compared to the control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of radiotherapyrelated adverse events (P >0.05). Conclusion Linear accelerator radiotherapy can significantly improve both the short-term response rate and the long-term survival rate in elderly patients with NSCLC without increasing the risk of treatment-related adverse events, demonstrating good safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

廖世海.直线加速器放射治疗老年 NSCLC 患者的临床疗效与安全性评价[J].生物医学工程学进展,2025,46(4):495-501

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-22
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-30
  • 录用日期:2025-06-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码