父母陪伴的术后情绪调控辅助联合语音干预对全麻患儿苏醒质量的研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

许昌中医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effects of Parental Accompaniment Postoperative Emotional Regulation Assistance with Voice Intervention on the Recovery Quality in Pediatric Patients under General Anesthesia
Author:
Affiliation:

Xuchang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨父母陪伴的术后情绪调控辅助联合语音干预对全麻患儿苏醒期躁动、血流动力学及应激状态的影响。方法 选取 2021 年 7 月至 2024 年 9 月在许昌中医院接受手术治疗的 89 例全麻患儿为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为 A 组( n=45)和 B 组( n=44), B 组接受常规干预, A 组在 B 组的基础上接受父母陪伴的情绪调控联合语音干预。观察两组患儿苏醒期躁动[ 麻醉苏醒期躁动量化评分表( PAED)评分和 Steward 苏醒( SRS)评分] 、血流动力学(血压和心率)、应激状态(去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素)、苏醒质量(麻醉清醒时间、呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、语言自主表达时间)和麻醉苏醒期不良事件发生率。 结果 A 组 PAED 评分低于 B 组,躁动时间短于 B 组, SRS 评分高于 B 组(均 P<0.05); A 组平均血压和心率均低于 B 组(均 P<0.05);术后 A 组去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素水平低于 B 组(均 P<0.05); A 组麻醉清醒时间[( 15.97±4.31) min] 、呼吸恢复时间[( 3.14±0.87) min] 、睁眼时间[( 11.87±2.01) min] 、语言自主表达时间[( 21.64±2.58) min] 均短于 B 组[分别为( 20.21±6.67) min、( 4.21±1.02) min、( 14.87±1.58) min、( 29.68±7.36)min] (均 P<0.05); A 组恶心呕吐、呼吸道梗阻、剧烈咳嗽、喉痉挛等的总发生率( 4.44%)低于 B 组( 20.45%)( P<0.05)。 结论 全麻手术患儿接受父母陪伴的术后情绪调控辅助联合语音干预可通过减少应激因子的释放,改善血流动力学、提高苏醒质量和缩短躁动时间,并降低麻醉苏醒期的不良事件发生率。该研究为优化临床全麻患儿术后苏醒质量方案提供了借鉴,具有潜在的智能化护理应用前景。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effects of a parent-accompaniment postoperative emotional regulation assistance combined with voice intervention on emergence agitation, hemodynamics, and stress state during the recovery period in children under general anesthesia. Methods A total of 89 children under general anesthesia who underwent surgical treatment in Xuchang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from July 2021 to September 2024 were selected as the research subjects and divided into group A( n=45) and group B( n=44) according to the random number table method. The 44 cases in group B received conventional intervention, and the 45 cases in group A received emotional regulation and voice intervention from their parents on the basis of group B. The two groups were compared in terms of agitation during the recovery period [pediatrie anaesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) score, Steward recovery score (SRS)], hemodynamics (blood pressure, heart rate), stress state (norepinephrine, epinephrine), recovery quality (anesthesia emergence time, respiratory recovery time, eye opening time, language autonomous expression time) and the incidence of adverse events during the anesthesia recovery period. Results Group A showed significantly lower PAED scores, shorter agitation duration, and higher SRS than group B (all P<0.05). Mean blood pressure and heart rate were lower in group A than in group B (P<0.05). Postoperative levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine were significantly reduced in group A (P<0.05). The anesthesia emergence time [(15.97±4.31) min], respiratory recovery time [(3.14±0.87) min], eye opening time [(11.87±2.01) min], and autonomous language expression time [(21.64±2.58) min] in group A were all shorter than those in group B [(20.21±6.67) min, (4.21±1.02) min, (14.87±1.58) min, (29.68±7.36) min, respectively] (all P<0.05). The total incidence of adverse events (nausea/vomiting, respiratory obstruction, severe cough, laryngospasm) in group A (4.44%) was significantly lower than that in group B (20.45%, P <0.05). Conclusion A postoperative emotional regulation assistance with voice intervention for pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia surgery who receive parental accompaniment improves hemodynamics, recovery quality, and duration of agitation by attenuating the release of stressors, and reduces the incidence of adverse events during emergencing from anesthesia. This study provides a reference for optimizing the quality of postoperative recovery in children undergoing general anesthesia, and the program has potential application prospects in intelligent nursing.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

仝桃珠,都银丽,赵飞帆.父母陪伴的术后情绪调控辅助联合语音干预对全麻患儿苏醒质量的研究[J].生物医学工程学进展,2025,46(4):477-482

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-21
  • 最后修改日期:2025-06-20
  • 录用日期:2025-06-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码