病人参与式聚硅酮的泡沫敷料干预方案对骨折患者压力性损伤和炎症因子水平的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

商丘市中心医院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effect of a Patient-Participatory Poly-Silicone Foam Dressing Intervention Programme on Pressure Injury and Inflammatory Factor Levels in Fracture Patients
Author:
Affiliation:

Shangqiu Central Hospital

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨病人参与式聚硅酮的泡沫敷料干预方案对骨折患者压力性损伤和炎症因子水平的影响。 方法 选取商丘市中心医院骨科 2022 年 3 月至 2024 年 9 月收治的 86 例骨折患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组(n=43,采取常规护理)和观察组(n=43,在常规护理的基础上采取病人参与式聚硅酮的泡沫敷料干预方案),比较两组压力性损伤情况、炎症因子水平、伤口愈合情况和舒适程度。 结果 干预前,两组 Bates-Jensen 伤口评估量表(BWAT)评分、伤口面积、舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分、 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素 -6(IL-6)、白细胞介素 -8(IL-8)和肿瘤坏死因子 -α(TNF-α)水平对比均无差异(P > 0.05)。干预后,观察组 BWAT 评分 [(14.09± 1.02) vs(15.45± 1.13) ] 和CRP[(15.09± 2.02) vs(18.45± 2.73) ]、 IL-6[(30.33± 2.61) vs(37.46± 2.75) ]、 IL-8[(38.54± 5.99) vs(42.65± 5.87) ]、TNF-α[(18.55± 3.64) vs(22.75± 3.82) ] 水平均低于对照组(P < 0.05),伤口面积 [(1.33± 0.11) vs(1.40± 0.15) ] 小于对照组(P < 0.05),创面愈合率 [(75.63± 8.24) vs(72.07± 7.08) ] 高于对照组(P < 0.05), GCQ 评分高于对照组(P < 0.05),压力性损伤发生率(4.65% vs 18.60%)低于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 病人参与式聚硅酮的泡沫敷料干预方案可有效预防骨折患者压力性损伤发生,降低炎症因子水平,促进伤口愈合,提升患者舒适度。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effect of a patient-participatory poly-silicone foam dressing intervention programme on pressure injury and inflammatory factor levels in fracture patients. Methods 86 cases of fracture patients admitted to Department of Orthopedics, Shangqiu Central Hospital from March 2022 to September 2024 were selected and randomly divided into the control group (n=43, receiving the routine nursing care) and the observation group (n=43, on the basis of the routine nursing care, the patient participated in the foam dressing intervention scheme) . The pressure injuries, inflammatory factor levels, wound healing and comfort level of the two groups were compared. Results Before intervention, there was no significant difference (P >0.05) in the scores of the Bates Jensen wound assessment tool (BWAT), wound area, General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) between the two groups. After intervention, the BWAT score[(14.09 ±1.02 )vs(15.45 ±1.13)] and the average levels of CRP[(15.09 ±2.02)vs(18.45 ±2.73)], IL-6[(30.33 ±2.61) vs(37.46±2.75)], IL-8[(38.54±5.99)vs(42.65±5.87)], and TNF-α[(18.55±3.64)vs(22.75±3.82)] in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The wound area[(1.33±0.11)vs(1.40 ±0.15)]was smaller than that of the control group (P <0.05). The wound healing rate[(75.63 ±8.24)vs(72.07 ±7.08)]is higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The GCQ score was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the incidence rate of pressure injuries (4.65%vs18.60%) was lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion The patient-participatory poly-silicone foam dressing intervention programme can effectively prevent pressure injuries in fracture patients, reduce the levels of inflammatory factors, promote wound healing, and improve patients’ comfort.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈艳,江华,朱艳阁.病人参与式聚硅酮的泡沫敷料干预方案对骨折患者压力性损伤和炎症因子水平的影响[J].生物医学工程学进展,2025,46(4):535-541

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-14
  • 最后修改日期:2025-05-08
  • 录用日期:2025-05-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码